Actinic prurigo (AP) and polymorphic light eruption (PLE) both belong to the group of idiopathic photodermatoses, but it remains controversial whether AP is a distinct photodermatosis or a variant of PLE. The aim of this study, by collecting data from 119 patients with features of these disorders, was to establish whether specific criteria could be used to distinguish AP from PLE prospectively. We found that presence of the eruption on both exposed and covered sites, its occurrence in winter, persistence of lesions beyond 4 weeks, mucosal and conjunctival involvement, excoriation and scarring of the skin were important features of AP which were not typical of PLE. On this basis, confident clinical diagnoses could be reached in 103 of 119 patients (87%), 57 with AP and 46 with PLE, supported by phototesting and negative lupus serology. HLA typing subsequently confirmed the strong association (90%) between AP and the DR4 allele, in particular with the rare subtype DRB1*0407 which was present in 60% of these patients. No HLA association was found in PLE. In the 16 remaining cases, however, clinical overlap meant that no definite diagnosis could be made; these patients were notionally described as having persistent PLE (PPLE). Demographic and HLA data in this group suggested that PPLE was perhaps most appropriately grouped with PLE. In addition to those patients who were difficult to classify, 35% of our typical AP patients also described clinical progression from PLE to AP, AP to PLE or coexistence of both AP and PLE. In conclusion, our study suggests that while AP and PLE are clinically distinct conditions in most cases, they may perhaps share a common pathophysiological basis. The AP phenotype may be determined by HLA and perhaps other factors in patients otherwise predisposed to PLE.