Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in follow-up samples from patients with ALL is essential for evaluation of treatment response. We applied multicolor flow cytometry and real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) to compare MRD results in 71 follow-up samples from 22 children treated for ALL. When results obtained by flow cytometry and RQ-PCR were grouped into positive-negative categories, a significant level of agreement was found in 72% of samples (P<0.001). However, if a cutoff level of 0.01% was applied, the concordance was 89%. MRD could be quantified in 19 samples by both methods, showing a strong correlation (P<0.01). Nevertheless, MRD levels differed more than five-fold between both methods in 4/19 samples. In 20 (28%) samples, the two techniques showed discordant results. Most discordant results (17/20) were due to the limited sensitivity of flow cytometry analysis within the range 0.01-0.001%; remaining discordant results were due to the instable or subclonal IG/TCR gene rearrangements or a limited quantitative range of the applied RQ-PCR targets. Although concordant results could be obtained by flow cytometry and RQ-PCR analysis, MRD levels may differ. Therefore, MRD data obtained by these two techniques are not yet easily exchangeable.