We examined attitudes regarding genetic testing and psychosocial outcomes of HFE genotyping for hemochromatosis. A total of 87 persons with hemochromatosis (patients) (39 women, 48 men), who underwent HFE genotyping, and 50 persons with hypertension (controls) (22 women, 28 men), who had not undergone HFE genotyping, completed a structured interview in which they reported attitudes about benefits and disadvantages of genetic testing and their understanding of genetics and hemochromatosis. Among patients, adherence to treatment for hemochromatosis was assessed. Controls estimated the likelihood of experiencing several potential positive and negative psychosocial outcomes after a positive genetic test. Patients reported their experience pertinent to these outcomes. Patients received information about hemochromatosis when they were diagnosed, and controls read a brief description of hemochromatosis before answering questions. Patients correctly answered 65% of knowledge questions and controls correctly answered 59%. Most participants believed genetic testing is beneficial and described few negative aspects of testing. Controls expected to experience more anxiety, depression, and anger related to a positive genetic test than was reported by patients (p < 0.001). One patient reported discrimination related to the HFE genotype. Most patients were compliant with the iron depletion and maintenance phases of treatment for hemochromatosis. Race, sex, marital status, income, education, barriers to treatment, and knowledge were not significantly associated with adherence to maintenance phlebotomy. We conclude that HFE genotyping appears to be viewed positively and would be generally accepted were it offered as part of a screening program for hemochromatosis. Persons who have not undergone genetic testing may overestimate their emotional responses to a positive test result. In the present hemochromatosis patients, few reported that HFE genotyping was accompanied by negative psychosocial outcomes.