Purpose: Summarize evidence regarding genetic testing in adults to inform warfarin dosing to reduce adverse drug events such as serious bleeding.
Methods: Review published (and selected gray) literature using the Rapid-ACCE structure that addresses analytic validity, clinical validity, clinical utility, and ethical, legal, and social implications.
Results: Preliminary data suggest overall analytic sensitivity and specificity will be 98% or higher for CYP2C9 genotyping, but strength of evidence for analytic validity is low, especially for VKORC1 testing. Strength of evidence is high for the clinical validity of both genes in predicting stable warfarin dose, an intermediate outcome, but is low for the association between CYP2C9 testing and severe bleeding events (clinical sensitivity 46% (95% CI 32-60%); specificity 69% (95% CI 62-75%) and absent for bleeding events associated with VKORC1 testing. No data are available to document clinical utility of genotyping before warfarin dosing.
Conclusions: The most important gaps identified are: which variants should be included in a testing panel, lack of data from external proficiency testing, lack of validated dosing algorithm incorporating genetic and nongenetic factors, evidence of clinical utility, reliable economic analyses, and methods to address several ethical, legal, and social implications issues.