quantitative assessment of the influence of cytochrome P450 1A2 gene polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk

PLoS One. 2013 Aug 12;8(8):e71481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071481. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

Cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) encodes a member of the cytochrome P450 superfamily of enzymes, which play a central role in activating and detoxifying many carcinogens and endogenous compounds thought to be involved in the development of colorectal cancer (CRC). The CYP1A2*C (rs2069514) and CYP1A2*F (rs762551) polymorphism are two of the most commonly studied polymorphisms of the gene for their association with risk of CRC, but the results are conflicting. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship between CYP1A2 and genetic risk of CRC, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis which included 7088 cases and 7568 controls from 12 published case-control studies. In a combined analysis, the summary per-allele odds ratio for CRC was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.83-1.00, P = 0.04), and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.68-1.22, P = 0.53), for CYP1A2 *F and *C allele, respectively. In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significant associations were found in Asians for CYP1A2*F and CYP1A2*C, while no significant associations were detected among Caucasian populations. Similar results were also observed using dominant genetic model. Potential sources of heterogeneity were explored by subgroup analysis and meta-regression. No significant heterogeneity was detected in most of comparisons. This meta-analysis suggests that the CYP1A2 *F and *C polymorphism is a protective factor against CRC among Asians.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Alleles
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / ethnology
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / genetics*
  • Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2 / genetics*
  • Genetic Predisposition to Disease
  • Humans
  • Odds Ratio
  • Polymorphism, Genetic*
  • Risk

Substances

  • Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2

Grants and funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81201535), and Shanghai Natural Science Foundation (12ZR1436000). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.