Molecular classification of myeloproliferative neoplasms-pros and cons

Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2013 Dec;8(4):342-50. doi: 10.1007/s11899-013-0179-9.

Abstract

Dameshek first postulated a common myeloproliferative heritage for the myeloproliferative disorders, now termed neoplasms. This prescient observation was validated by the description of a common mutation in exon 14 of JAK2 for patients with essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera and primary myelofibrosis. In recent years, our knowledge of the molecular abnormalities underpinning these disorders has expanded significantly. At the same time, we have continued to use a classification based largely upon the first clinical descriptions of these entities, which sometimes proves problematic in differentiating between these conditions and normal reactive processes, myelodysplasia and between the myeloproliferative neoplasm entities themselves. Here, we discuss the pros and cons of a molecular classification and its potential utility in diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutics.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Antineoplastic Agents / therapeutic use
  • Epigenomics
  • Hematologic Neoplasms / diagnosis
  • Hematologic Neoplasms / genetics
  • Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Janus Kinase 2 / genetics
  • Molecular Targeted Therapy / methods
  • Myeloproliferative Disorders / classification*
  • Myeloproliferative Disorders / diagnosis
  • Myeloproliferative Disorders / drug therapy
  • Myeloproliferative Disorders / genetics
  • Polycythemia Vera / diagnosis
  • Polycythemia Vera / genetics
  • Primary Myelofibrosis / diagnosis
  • Primary Myelofibrosis / genetics
  • Prognosis
  • Protein Kinase Inhibitors / therapeutic use
  • Thrombocythemia, Essential / diagnosis
  • Thrombocythemia, Essential / genetics

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors
  • Protein Kinase Inhibitors
  • Janus Kinase 2