Nonselective vitamin D receptor activators (VDRA), such as calcitriol and alfacalcidol, have been successfully used in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in hemodialysis. Despite their beneficial effects on the control of serum PTH levels, their use has been limited by intolerance (development of hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia with consecutive cardiovascular toxicity). Apart from becoming intolerant, in 20-30 % of patients who use nonselective VDRA, serum PTH levels do not decrease appropriately despite increasing doses of these agents. These patients are considered calcitriol-resistant patients. Thus, calcitriol resistance and intolerance are two sides of the same coin: active vitamin D failure. Despite the clinical relevance of active vitamin D failure, definitions of resistance and intolerance are imprecise and have varied over time. More selective VDRA claim to produce less hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia and could help clinicians to overcome intolerance. Also, some studies have also shown that paricalcitol can be even useful in resistant patients. Significant limitations of iPTH as a reliable and useful clinical biomarker have been increasingly appreciated. There is evidence that intact PTH concentration must differ by 72 % between any two measurements before it can be considered a significant change. VDR polymorphisms could be involved in the development of SHPT in CKD patients. Interestingly, a higher incidence of the b allele of the VDR BsmI gene variant has been shown to be present in SHPT. The BsmI genotype can also affect the response of hemodialysis to IV calcitriol. A challenge for the future will be to establish biomarkers such as laboratory determinations or ultrasound findings that can help us to early identify those patients who will not respond appropriately to calcitriol or exhibit intolerable side effects .