Multicenter Experience with Boceprevir or Telaprevir to Treat Hepatitis C Recurrence after Liver Transplantation: When Present Becomes Past, What Lessons for Future?

PLoS One. 2015 Sep 22;10(9):e0138091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138091. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Background and aims: First generation protease inhibitors (PI) with peg-interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) have been the only therapy available for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection in most countries for 3 years. We have investigated the efficacy and tolerance of this triple therapy in transplanted patients experiencing a recurrence of HCV infection on the liver graft.

Patients: This cohort study enrolled 81 liver transplant patients (Male: 76%, mean age: 55.8±9.7 years) with severe HCV recurrence (F3 or F4: n = 34 (42%), treatment experienced: n = 44 (54%)), treated with boceprevir (n = 36; 44%) or telaprevir (n = 45; 56%). We assessed the percentages of patients with sustained virological responses 24 weeks after therapy (SVR24), and safety.

Results: The SVR24 rate was 47% (telaprevir: 42%; boceprevir: 53%, P = ns). At baseline, a normal bilirubin level (p = 0.0145) and albumin level >35g/L (p = 0.0372) and an initial RBV dosage of ≥800 mg/day (p = 0.0033) predicted SVR24. During treatment, achieving an early virological response after 12 weeks was the strongest independent factor to predict SVR24 (p<0.0001). A premature discontinuation of anti-HCV therapy due to a serious adverse event (SAE) was observed in 22 patients (27%). Hematological toxicity, infections and deaths were observed in 95%, 28% and 7% of patients, respectively. A history of post-LT antiviral therapy and thrombocytopenia (<50G/L) during treatment were both independent predictors of the occurrence of infections or SAE (p = 0.0169 and p = 0.011).

Conclusions: The use of first generation PI after liver transplantation enabled an SVR24 rate of 47% in genotype 1 patients, but induced a high rate of SAE. The identification of predictive factors for a response to treatment, and the occurrence of SAE, have enabled us to establish limits for the use of this anti-HCV therapy in the transplant setting.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Anemia / chemically induced
  • Antiviral Agents / adverse effects
  • Antiviral Agents / pharmacology
  • Combined Modality Therapy
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Female
  • Genotype
  • Hepacivirus / drug effects*
  • Hepacivirus / enzymology
  • Hepacivirus / physiology
  • Hepatitis C / genetics
  • Hepatitis C / therapy*
  • Hepatitis C / virology
  • Host-Pathogen Interactions / drug effects
  • Humans
  • Interferon-alpha / adverse effects
  • Interferon-alpha / pharmacology
  • Liver Transplantation / methods*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Oligopeptides / adverse effects
  • Oligopeptides / pharmacology*
  • Polyethylene Glycols / adverse effects
  • Polyethylene Glycols / pharmacology
  • Postoperative Period
  • Proline / adverse effects
  • Proline / analogs & derivatives*
  • Proline / pharmacology
  • Prospective Studies
  • Protease Inhibitors / adverse effects
  • Protease Inhibitors / pharmacology
  • Recombinant Proteins / adverse effects
  • Recombinant Proteins / pharmacology
  • Recurrence
  • Thrombocytopenia / chemically induced
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Antiviral Agents
  • Interferon-alpha
  • Oligopeptides
  • Protease Inhibitors
  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Polyethylene Glycols
  • telaprevir
  • N-(3-amino-1-(cyclobutylmethyl)-2,3-dioxopropyl)-3-(2-((((1,1-dimethylethyl)amino)carbonyl)amino)-3,3-dimethyl-1-oxobutyl)-6,6-dimethyl-3-azabicyclo(3.1.0)hexan-2-carboxamide
  • Proline
  • peginterferon alfa-2a

Grants and funding

The authors have no support or funding to report.