Endoscopic treatment of benign esophageal strictures: a literature review

Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jan;11(1):53-64. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2017.1260002. Epub 2016 Nov 22.

Abstract

Benign esophageal strictures arise from various etiologies and are frequently encountered. Although endoscopic dilation is still the first-line therapy, recurrent strictures do occur in approximately 10% of the cases and remains a challenge to gastroenterologists. Areas covered: A literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar databases for original and review articles on endoscopic treatment of benign esophageal strictures. This review outlines the main available treatment options and its controversies in the management of refractory benign esophageal strictures. Expert commentary: Adding local steroid injections to dilation can be effective for peptic stenosis and strictures after endoscopic submucosal dissection, but remains uncertain for anastomotic strictures. Intralesional injections of mitomycin-C could be useful in corrosive strictures. Incisional therapy can be a reliable alternative in Schatzki rings and in anastomotic strictures, in experienced hands. By contrast, long-term outcome with endoprosthetic treatment is disappointing, and stent placement should be carefully considered and individualized.

Keywords: Benign esophageal strictures; dilation; incisional therapy; mitomycin C; stents; steroid injection.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Absorbable Implants
  • Dilatation
  • Esophageal Stenosis / diagnosis
  • Esophageal Stenosis / etiology
  • Esophageal Stenosis / therapy*
  • Esophagoscopy* / adverse effects
  • Esophagoscopy* / instrumentation
  • Humans
  • Injections, Intralesional
  • Mitomycin / administration & dosage
  • Recurrence
  • Risk Factors
  • Stents
  • Steroids / administration & dosage
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Steroids
  • Mitomycin