Stereo-electroencephalography-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation in patients with focal epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: Despite the increasing number of studies reporting results of stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG)-guided radiofrequency-thermocoagulation (SEEG-guided RF-TC) in the treatment of patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, the exact efficacy of this approach remains unclear. The seizure-freedom rate varies greatly across studies and the factors associated with efficacy have not been formally investigated.

Methods: All prospective or retrospective studies reporting efficacy and/or safety of SEEG-guided RF-TC in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy were included. The primary outcome was the seizure-free rate 1 year after the procedure. Secondary outcomes were (1) the responder rate 1 year after the procedure and (2) the proportion of patients with permanent neurologic deficit 1 year after the procedure. Each outcome was assessed in all patients and in 4 groups of patients defined by the etiology of epilepsy. Each outcome was pooled using inverse variance weighting, logit transformation of proportion, and a random-effects model.

Results: No prospective study was identified and a total of 6 retrospective studies, reporting efficacy and safety data of 296 patients, were included. The pooled rate of permanent neurologic deficit was 2.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2%-5.3%), without heterogeneity across studies. In contrast, both the seizure-free and responder rates varied greatly across studies, and statistical heterogeneity was high. The pooled seizure-free and responder rates were 23% (95% CI 8%-50%) and 58% (95% CI 36%-77%), respectively. Both for the seizure-free and responder rates, the greatest efficacy was observed in patients with periventricular nodular heterotopia and the lowest in patients with normal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings.

Significance: SEEG-guided RF-TC is a safe procedure with low risk of complications. In contrast, the level of evidence regarding its efficacy remains low. Better identification of factors associated with seizure outcome are needed.