Identification and external validation of a prognostic signature associated with DNA repair genes in gastric cancer

Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 30;11(1):7141. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86504-8.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to construct and validate a DNA repair-related gene signature for evaluating the overall survival (OS) of patients with gastric cancer (GC). Differentially expressed DNA repair genes between GC and normal gastric tissue samples obtained from the TCGA database were identified. Univariate Cox analysis was used to screen survival-related genes and multivariate Cox analysis was applied to construct a DNA repair-related gene signature. An integrated bioinformatics approach was performed to evaluate its diagnostic and prognostic value. The prognostic model and the expression levels of signature genes were validated using an independent external validation cohort. Two genes (CHAF1A, RMI1) were identified to establish the prognostic signature and patients ware stratified into high- and low-risk groups. Patients in high-risk group presented significant shorter survival time than patients in the low-risk group in both cohorts, which were verified by the ROC curves. Multivariate analysis showed that the prognostic signature was an independent predictor for patients with GC after adjustment for other known clinical parameters. A nomogram incorporating the signature and known clinical factors yielded better performance and net benefits in calibration plot and decision curve analyses. Further, the logistic regression classifier based on the two genes presented an excellent diagnostic power in differentiating early HCC and normal tissues with AUCs higher than 0.9. Moreover, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis revealed that diverse cancer-related pathways significantly clustered in the high-risk and low-risk groups. Immune cell infiltration analysis revealed that CHAF1A and RMI1 were correlated with several types of immune cell subtypes. A prognostic signature using CHAF1A and RMI1 was developed that effectively predicted different OS rates among patients with GC. This risk model provides new clinical evidence for the diagnostic accuracy and survival prediction of GC.

Publication types

  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Carcinoma / genetics
  • Carcinoma / mortality*
  • Chromatin Assembly Factor-1 / genetics
  • DNA Repair / genetics
  • DNA-Binding Proteins / genetics*
  • Humans
  • Nomograms
  • Prognosis
  • Stomach Neoplasms / genetics
  • Stomach Neoplasms / mortality*

Substances

  • CHAF1A protein, human
  • Chromatin Assembly Factor-1
  • DNA-Binding Proteins
  • RMI1 protein, human