FISH analysis for CML monitoring?

Ann Hematol. 1996 Sep;73(3):113-9. doi: 10.1007/s002770050211.

Abstract

Conventional cytogenetics is considered the gold standard for evaluating CML during interferon (IFN) treatment. Drawbacks to this approach are the small number of metaphases available during IFN therapy and the impossibility of scoring interphase cells. We applied, besides cytogenetics, double-color FISH (dc-FISH) detection of BCR-ABL gene fusion to monitor 20 CML patients on IFN. dc-FISH easily detected 200 cells per specimen, while with cytogenetic examination a mean of 16.1 mitoses per sample were scored. Though the correlation of dc-FISH and cytogenetic data was good (r = 0.77, p < 0.001), the discrepancy between the two methods as regards the proportion of leukemic cells in the marrow was often important dc-FISH detected a relevant proportion of BCR-ABL+ cells in three patients classified as complete cytogenetic responders and showed that, after 9-12 months of IFN treatment, a significant reduction of BCR-ABL+ cells was present in all the 20 patients tested. This might suggest that all CML patients are potentially responsive to IFN. Though more data are required, we think that dc-FISH is more informative than cytogenetic analysis for CML monitoring. Notably because of the simplicity of the procedure, this method could be easily standardized among different laboratories, thus permitting cross-comparison in therapeutic trials.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Cytogenetics / methods
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl / genetics
  • Genes
  • Humans
  • In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence / methods*
  • Interferons / therapeutic use*
  • Interphase
  • Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive / genetics*
  • Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive / pathology
  • Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive / therapy*

Substances

  • Interferons
  • Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl