Purpose: Subluxation techniques are superior to divide-and-conquer in procedure duration, pain, and ultrasound quantity, but their safety in endothelial cell loss (ECL) is unclear. This randomized single-blind noninferiority clinical trial aimed to determine whether subluxation supracapsular phacoemulsification techniques are inferior to a reference endocapsular technique (divide-and-conquer) regarding postoperative corneal ECL.
Methods: Patients (aged18 years or older) with greater than +0.2 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution best spectacle-corrected visual acuity and normal to severe density cataract were randomized to subluxation or divide-and-conquer phacoemulsification in 2015 to 2016. Follow-up with ophthalmic tests was conducted on day 4 and months 1, 3, and 12. The primary study outcome was ECL at all time points. Secondary study end points were operative variables, including effective phaco time and procedure duration. A clinically relevant noninferiority ECL limit was established on the basis of the literature.
Results: In total, 292 patients (mean age, 73 yrs; 59% female) were randomized and underwent subluxation (n = 148) or divide-and-conquer (n = 144). Day 4 and month 1, 3, and 12 data were available for 243, 270, 275, and 198 patients, respectively. The unexpectedly high dropout at 12 months meant that the 12-month ECL data could only be assessed qualitatively. Surgery was successful in all patients. Subluxation was noninferior to divide-and-conquer in ECL. Effective phaco times were similar, but subluxation associated with shorter procedure duration.
Conclusions: The subluxation technique was noninferior to divide-and-conquer regarding postoperative ECL, at least in the first 3 months, and associated with reduced intervention time. Subluxation techniques may be suitable alternatives to endocapsular techniques.Clinical Trial Registration-URL: ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02535819.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.