U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

Irinotecan response

MedGen UID:
450461
Concept ID:
CN077989
Sign or Symptom
Synonym: Camptosar response
Drug:
Irinotecan
MedGen UID:
50757
Concept ID:
C0123931
Pharmacologic Substance
A semisynthetic derivative of camptothecin, a cytotoxic, quinoline-based alkaloid extracted from the Asian tree Camptotheca acuminata. Irinotecan, a prodrug, is converted to a biologically active metabolite 7-ethyl-10-hydroxy-camptothecin (SN-38) by a carboxylesterase-converting enzyme. One thousand-fold more potent than its parent compound irinotecan, SN-38 inhibits topoisomerase I activity by stabilizing the cleavable complex between topoisomerase I and DNA, resulting in DNA breaks that inhibit DNA replication and trigger apoptotic cell death. Because ongoing DNA synthesis is necessary for irinotecan to exert its cytotoxic effects, it is classified as an S-phase-specific agent. [from NCI]
 
Gene (location): UGT1A1 (2q37.1)

Definition

Irinotecan (brand name Camptosar) is a topoisomerase I inhibitor widely used in the treatment of cancer. It is most frequently used in combination with other drugs to treat advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. However, irinotecan therapy is associated with a high incidence of toxicity, including severe neutropenia and diarrhea. Irinotecan is converted in the body to an active metabolite known as SN-38, which is then inactivated and detoxified by a UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzyme encoded by the UGT1A1 gene. The UGT enzymes are responsible for glucuronidation, a process that transforms lipophilic metabolites into water-soluble metabolites that can be excreted from the body. The risk of irinotecan toxicity increases with genetic variants associated with reduced UGT enzyme activity, such as UGT1A1*28. The presence of this variant results in reduced excretion of irinotecan metabolites, which leads to increased active irinotecan metabolites in the blood. Approximately 10% of North Americans carry 2 copies of the UGT1A1*28 allele (homozygous, UGT1A1 *28/*28), and are more likely to develop neutropenia following irinotecan therapy. The FDA-approved drug label for irinotecan states that “when administered as a single-agent, a reduction in the starting dose by at least one level of irinotecan hydrochloride injection should be considered for patients known to be homozygous for the UGT1A1*28 allele. However, the precise dose reduction in this patient population is not known and subsequent dose modifications should be considered based on individual patient tolerance to treatment”. The Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) of the Royal Dutch Association for the Advancement of Pharmacy (KNMP) recommends starting with 70% of the standard dose for homozygous carriers of the UGT1A1*28 allele. If the patient tolerates this initial dose, the dose can be increased guided by the neutrophil count. They state that no action is needed for heterozygous carriers of the UGT1A1*28 allele (e.g., UGT1A1 *1/*28). In addition, the French National Network of Pharmacogenetics (RNPGx) has proposed a decision tree for guiding irinotecan prescribing based on the UGT1A1 genotype and irinotecan dose. [from Medical Genetics Summaries]

Professional guidelines

PubMed

De Dosso S, Siebenhüner AR, Winder T, Meisel A, Fritsch R, Astaras C, Szturz P, Borner M
Cancer Treat Rev 2021 May;96:102180. Epub 2021 Mar 17 doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102180. PMID: 33812339
Bailly C
Pharmacol Res 2019 Oct;148:104398. Epub 2019 Aug 12 doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104398. PMID: 31415916
de Man FM, Goey AKL, van Schaik RHN, Mathijssen RHJ, Bins S
Clin Pharmacokinet 2018 Oct;57(10):1229-1254. doi: 10.1007/s40262-018-0644-7. PMID: 29520731Free PMC Article

Curated

National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry, Clinical practice considerations. In: Laboratory medicine practice guidelines: guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis and application of pharmacogenetics to clinical practice, 2010

Recent clinical studies

Etiology

Matsuoka H, Ando K, Swayze EJ, Unan EC, Mathew J, Hu Q, Tsuda Y, Nakashima Y, Saeki H, Oki E, Bharti AK, Mori M
PLoS One 2020;15(8):e0228002. Epub 2020 Aug 7 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228002. PMID: 32764831Free PMC Article
Kümler I, Balslev E, Stenvang J, Brünner N, Nielsen D
BMC Cancer 2015 Feb 21;15:78. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1072-9. PMID: 25885574Free PMC Article
Dias MM, McKinnon RA, Sorich MJ
Pharmacogenomics 2012 Jun;13(8):889-99. doi: 10.2217/pgs.12.68. PMID: 22676194
Colavolpe C, Chinot O, Metellus P, Mancini J, Barrie M, Bequet-Boucard C, Tabouret E, Mundler O, Figarella-Branger D, Guedj E
Neuro Oncol 2012 May;14(5):649-57. Epub 2012 Feb 29 doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nos012. PMID: 22379188Free PMC Article

Diagnosis

Matsuoka H, Ando K, Swayze EJ, Unan EC, Mathew J, Hu Q, Tsuda Y, Nakashima Y, Saeki H, Oki E, Bharti AK, Mori M
PLoS One 2020;15(8):e0228002. Epub 2020 Aug 7 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228002. PMID: 32764831Free PMC Article
Wood JP, Smith AJ, Bowman KJ, Thomas AL, Jones GD
Cancer Med 2015 Sep;4(9):1309-21. Epub 2015 Jun 23 doi: 10.1002/cam4.477. PMID: 26108357Free PMC Article
Meisenberg C, Gilbert DC, Chalmers A, Haley V, Gollins S, Ward SE, El-Khamisy SF
Mol Cancer Ther 2015 Feb;14(2):575-85. Epub 2014 Dec 18 doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0762. PMID: 25522766Free PMC Article
Li XX, Zheng HT, Peng JJ, Huang LY, Shi DB, Liang L, Cai SJ
Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2014;7(5):2729-36. Epub 2014 Apr 15 PMID: 24966994Free PMC Article
Fallik D, Borrini F, Boige V, Viguier J, Jacob S, Miquel C, Sabourin JC, Ducreux M, Praz F
Cancer Res 2003 Sep 15;63(18):5738-44. PMID: 14522894

Therapy

Wood JP, Smith AJ, Bowman KJ, Thomas AL, Jones GD
Cancer Med 2015 Sep;4(9):1309-21. Epub 2015 Jun 23 doi: 10.1002/cam4.477. PMID: 26108357Free PMC Article
Kümler I, Balslev E, Stenvang J, Brünner N, Nielsen D
BMC Cancer 2015 Feb 21;15:78. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1072-9. PMID: 25885574Free PMC Article
Martinez-Useros J, Rodriguez-Remirez M, Borrero-Palacios A, Moreno I, Cebrian A, Gomez del Pulgar T, del Puerto-Nevado L, Vega-Bravo R, Puime-Otin A, Perez N, Zazo S, Senin C, Fernandez-Aceñero MJ, Soengas MS, Rojo F, Garcia-Foncillas J
BMC Cancer 2014 Dec 16;14:965. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-965. PMID: 25515240Free PMC Article
Dias MM, McKinnon RA, Sorich MJ
Pharmacogenomics 2012 Jun;13(8):889-99. doi: 10.2217/pgs.12.68. PMID: 22676194
Colavolpe C, Chinot O, Metellus P, Mancini J, Barrie M, Bequet-Boucard C, Tabouret E, Mundler O, Figarella-Branger D, Guedj E
Neuro Oncol 2012 May;14(5):649-57. Epub 2012 Feb 29 doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nos012. PMID: 22379188Free PMC Article

Prognosis

Makondi PT, Chu CM, Wei PL, Chang YJ
PLoS One 2017;12(7):e0180616. Epub 2017 Jul 27 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180616. PMID: 28749961Free PMC Article
Meisenberg C, Gilbert DC, Chalmers A, Haley V, Gollins S, Ward SE, El-Khamisy SF
Mol Cancer Ther 2015 Feb;14(2):575-85. Epub 2014 Dec 18 doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0762. PMID: 25522766Free PMC Article
Martinez-Useros J, Rodriguez-Remirez M, Borrero-Palacios A, Moreno I, Cebrian A, Gomez del Pulgar T, del Puerto-Nevado L, Vega-Bravo R, Puime-Otin A, Perez N, Zazo S, Senin C, Fernandez-Aceñero MJ, Soengas MS, Rojo F, Garcia-Foncillas J
BMC Cancer 2014 Dec 16;14:965. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-965. PMID: 25515240Free PMC Article
Colavolpe C, Chinot O, Metellus P, Mancini J, Barrie M, Bequet-Boucard C, Tabouret E, Mundler O, Figarella-Branger D, Guedj E
Neuro Oncol 2012 May;14(5):649-57. Epub 2012 Feb 29 doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nos012. PMID: 22379188Free PMC Article
Raynal C, Pascussi JM, Leguelinel G, Breuker C, Kantar J, Lallemant B, Poujol S, Bonnans C, Joubert D, Hollande F, Lumbroso S, Brouillet JP, Evrard A
Mol Cancer 2010 Mar 2;9:46. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-9-46. PMID: 20196838Free PMC Article

Clinical prediction guides

Makondi PT, Chu CM, Wei PL, Chang YJ
PLoS One 2017;12(7):e0180616. Epub 2017 Jul 27 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180616. PMID: 28749961Free PMC Article
Kümler I, Balslev E, Stenvang J, Brünner N, Nielsen D
BMC Cancer 2015 Feb 21;15:78. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1072-9. PMID: 25885574Free PMC Article
Meisenberg C, Gilbert DC, Chalmers A, Haley V, Gollins S, Ward SE, El-Khamisy SF
Mol Cancer Ther 2015 Feb;14(2):575-85. Epub 2014 Dec 18 doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0762. PMID: 25522766Free PMC Article
Martinez-Useros J, Rodriguez-Remirez M, Borrero-Palacios A, Moreno I, Cebrian A, Gomez del Pulgar T, del Puerto-Nevado L, Vega-Bravo R, Puime-Otin A, Perez N, Zazo S, Senin C, Fernandez-Aceñero MJ, Soengas MS, Rojo F, Garcia-Foncillas J
BMC Cancer 2014 Dec 16;14:965. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-965. PMID: 25515240Free PMC Article
Raynal C, Pascussi JM, Leguelinel G, Breuker C, Kantar J, Lallemant B, Poujol S, Bonnans C, Joubert D, Hollande F, Lumbroso S, Brouillet JP, Evrard A
Mol Cancer 2010 Mar 2;9:46. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-9-46. PMID: 20196838Free PMC Article

Recent systematic reviews

Dias MM, McKinnon RA, Sorich MJ
Pharmacogenomics 2012 Jun;13(8):889-99. doi: 10.2217/pgs.12.68. PMID: 22676194

Therapeutic recommendations

From Medical Genetics Summaries

This section contains excerpted 2 information on gene-based dosing recommendations. Neither this section nor other parts of this review contain the complete recommendations from the sources.

2017 Statement from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

Individuals who are homozygous for the UGT1A1*28 allele (UGT1A1 7/7 genotype) are at increased risk for neutropenia following initiation of Irinotecan Hydrochloride Injection, USP treatment.

In a study of 66 patients who received single-agent Irinotecan Hydrochloride Injection, USP (350 mg/m2 once-every-3-weeks), the incidence of grade 4 neutropenia in patients homozygous for the UGT1A1*28 allele was 50%, and in patients heterozygous for this allele (UGT1A1 6/7 genotype) the incidence was 12.5%. No grade 4 neutropenia was observed in patients homozygous for the wild-type allele (UGT1A1 6/6 genotype).

When administered as a single-agent, a reduction in the starting dose by at least one level of Irinotecan Hydrochloride Injection, USP should be considered for patients known to be homozygous for the UGT1A1*28 allele. However, the precise dose reduction in this patient population is not known and subsequent dose modifications should be considered based on individual patient tolerance to treatment.

UGT1A1 Testing

A laboratory test is available to determine the UGT1A1 status of patients. Testing can detect the UGT1A1 6/6, 6/7 and 7/7 genotypes.

Please review the complete therapeutic recommendations that are located here: (1).

2017 Recommendations from the French National Network of Pharmacogenetics (RNPGx)

Interpreting Results

The RNPGx has proposed a decision tree for guiding irinotecan prescription based on the UGT1A1 genotype and the protocol’s theoretical dose:

  • for low doses (< 180 mg/m2 /week), presence of the UGT1A1*28 allele is not a major risk factor (little difference in risk of hematological or digestive toxicity irrespective of the genotype);
  • for doses in the 180—230mg/m2 spaced by 2—3-week intervals, patients who are homozygous for the UGT1A1*28 allele have a higher risk of hematological and/or digestive toxicity than patients who are heterozygous or non-carriers. For these *28/*28 patients, a 25% to 30% dose reduction is recommended, especially if the patient presents other risk factors for toxicity. Dose can be adjusted for subsequent cycles depending on the tolerance;
  • for doses of 240mg/m2 or higher spaced by 2—3 weeks intervals, homozygous UGT1A1*28 patients have a greatly increased risk of hematological toxicity (neutropenia) compared with other genotypes, contraindicating administration at this higher dose and leading to discussion of a standard dose depending on the associated risk factors. Administration of an intensive dose (240 mg/m2 ) is recommended only for *1/*1 patients, or for *1/*28 patients who have no other risk factors and who benefit from intensive surveillance.

[...]

The first-intention of this strategy for analysis of UGT1A1 status is to detect the *28 variant, the most common deficiency variant observed in the Caucasian population, to be performed before initiating treatment. Referring to the level of evidence classification for RNPGx recommendations detailed in the article by Picard et al. in this issue, UGT1A1 genotyping is advisable for a standard dose (180—230mg/m2 ) and essential for intensified dose (> 240 mg/m2 ).

Thus, individualized treatment can be proposed based on the UGT1A1 genotype, with either a dose reduction for *28/*28 homozygous patients, or possibly dose intensification for non-carriers of the *28 allele.

For the other UGT1A1 alleles, genotyping is performed by a limited number of laboratories and is considered a second- intention test.

Moreover, the RNPGx suggests that this analysis could be performed concomitantly with other genetic explorations for colorectal cancer patients (search for KRAS, BRAF mutations. . .) and constitutional (search for DYPD variants) in order to guarantee optimal irinotecan therapy within adequate delay for optimal hospital practices.

Please review the complete therapeutic recommendations that are located here: (5).

2014 Recommendations from the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) of the Royal Dutch Association for the Advancement of Pharmacy (KNMP)

UGT1A1 Intermediate Metabolizers (IM) NO action is needed for this gene-drug interaction.This genetic variation (IM) is more common in Western populations than the wild-type (*1/*1). This means that treatment is largely geared to patients with this genetic variation. Adjustment of the treatment is therefore not useful.

UGT1A1 Poor Metabolizers (PM) Genetic variation reduces conversion of irinotecan to inactive metabolites. This increases the risk of serious, life-threatening adverse events.Recommendation:1. Start with 70% of the standard doseIf the patient tolerates this initial dose, the dose can be increased, guided by the neutrophil count.

UGT1A1 *1/*28 NO action is needed for this gene-drug interaction.This genetic variation (*1/*28) is more common in Western populations than the wild-type (*1/*1). This means that treatment is largely geared to patients with this genetic variation. Adjustment of the treatment is therefore not useful.

UGT1A1 *28/*28 Genetic variation reduces conversion of irinotecan to inactive metabolites. This increases the risk of serious, life-threatening adverse events.Recommendation:1. Start with 70% of the standard doseIf the patient tolerates this initial dose, the dose can be increased, guided by the neutrophil count.

Please review the complete therapeutic recommendations that are located here: (4).

2 The FDA labels specific drug formulations. We have substituted the generic names for any drug labels in this excerpt. The FDA may not have labeled all formulations containing the generic drug.

Supplemental Content

Table of contents

    Clinical resources

    Practice guidelines

    • PubMed
      See practice and clinical guidelines in PubMed. The search results may include broader topics and may not capture all published guidelines. See the FAQ for details.

    Curated

    • NACB, 2010
      National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry, Clinical practice considerations. In: Laboratory medicine practice guidelines: guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis and application of pharmacogenetics to clinical practice, 2010

    Consumer resources

    Recent activity

    Your browsing activity is empty.

    Activity recording is turned off.

    Turn recording back on

    See more...